Discussion:
Stephen Colbert Defends Anti-Israel Campus Protesters After Trump Praises NYPD Response
Add Reply
Ubiquitous
2024-05-02 01:05:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.

On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.

At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.

Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.

"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."



Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.

"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.

Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.

Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."

Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.

At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.

--
Let's go Brandon!
John Doe
2024-05-03 18:42:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)

What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
NoBody
2024-05-04 13:46:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Max Boot
2024-05-04 19:15:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in November: 'It
depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
John Doe
2024-05-04 19:36:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
Blue Lives Matter
2024-05-04 21:50:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your request for me
to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant demands for
"cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I already found several
citations to support the claim:

"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in November: 'It
depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4

"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168

"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other takeaways from
his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html

"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024 election to
Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140

"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html


If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's instigation, just
as it was last time.
John Doe
2024-05-04 22:26:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
NoBody
2024-05-05 13:54:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?

""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""

Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.

Now do you OWN work.
Max Boot
2024-05-05 15:00:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Ditto. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
John Doe
2024-05-05 17:15:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Ditto. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Exactly. There are numerous quotes and video clips that back this up, It
would be so easy, if Trump disapproved of violence to settle political
differences, for him to say that clearly when questioned. He does not.
It's just like on January 6th when he could have stopped the violence at
any time, but failed to act until it was obvious that Pence was alive
and Trump wasn't going to get his way with violence.
Max Boot
2024-05-05 17:26:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Ditto. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Exactly. There are numerous quotes and video clips that back this up, It would
be so easy, if Trump disapproved of violence to settle political differences,
for him to say that clearly when questioned. He does not. It's just like on
January 6th when he could have stopped the violence at any time, but failed to
act until it was obvious that Pence was alive and Trump wasn't going to get his
way with violence.
Trump will say and do anything to prevail, including incitement of violence.
This is the third time he has refused to say he will respect the will of the
voters and concede an election that he loses. No other candidate for president
has ever done that before.
NoBody
2024-05-06 12:02:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Odd. Can you post the full context of the remark? Oh while you're
at it quote from any of these articles that talks about blood which
was your claim.

Your brain died when you started to rely on Rudely to do your
homework.
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
I quoted the exact remarks which didn't say what you claim they did.
Why did you snip them?
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Ditto. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
He didn't say that at all.
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Exactly. There are numerous quotes and video clips that back this up, It
would be so easy, if Trump disapproved of violence to settle political
differences, for him to say that clearly when questioned. He does not.
It's just like on January 6th when he could have stopped the violence at
any time, but failed to act until it was obvious that Pence was alive
and Trump wasn't going to get his way with violence.
It's so fun to read just how ignornant and unformed you loser lefties
are. Thanks for qutoing Rudely again so I can laugh at dumb you are.
Ubiquitous
2024-05-06 15:18:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Odd.
Not odd in the least. That is normal for Trump.
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
I quoted the exact remarks which didn't say what you claim they did.
They do say what I claim they did.
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Ditto. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
He didn't say that at all.
He did, in his usual roundabout way.
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Max Boot
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Exactly. There are numerous quotes and video clips that back this up, It
would be so easy, if Trump disapproved of violence to settle political
differences, for him to say that clearly when questioned. He does not.
It's just like on January 6th when he could have stopped the violence at
any time, but failed to act until it was obvious that Pence was alive
and Trump wasn't going to get his way with violence.
It's so fun to read just how ignornant and unformed you loser lefties
No.
NoBody
2024-05-07 11:29:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 6 May 2024 08:18:23 -0700, Ubiquitous
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by Max Boot
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Odd.
Not odd in the least. That is normal for Trump.
More dishonest snippage from Rudely. Here's the restored text.

"Odd. Can you post the full context of the remark? Oh while you're
at it quote from any of these articles that talks about blood which
was your claim.

Your brain died when you started to rely on Rudely to do your
homework."
Ubiquitous
2024-05-07 16:09:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 6 May 2024 08:18:23 -0700, Ubiquitous
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by Max Boot
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after
former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their
response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day
former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just
peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Prof. Canoza shows me to be a lying troll...
Yes.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
Yes.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote
That backs up my claim.
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote
Full context. Trump intends to incite violence if he loses.
Odd.
Not odd in the least. That is normal for Trump.
More dishonest snippage from Rudely.
No.
Post by NoBody
Here's the restored text.
Not needed. Trump always speaks in code when he's ordering illegal activity.

There is only one correct answer when a candidate is asked if he would support
violence if he loses the election, and that answer is an unequivocal "no." Trump
refused to say that. That means that Trump, who notoriously ordered his
deplorables to beat up rally attendees who heckled him and promised (lying, as
always) to pay their legal bills, *intends* to incite violence if he loses. You
know this. Stop lying about it and stop blabbering about "context." Full context
has been provided.
John Doe
2024-05-05 17:11:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
Max Boot
2024-05-05 17:16:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them.  Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim.  Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim.  Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense.  He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned replies
that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of name-calling and
denigration.  Well done!
Trump speaks in code. What Trump means by "fairness of an election" is an
election that he wins. If he loses the election, he *defines* it as "unfair" or
"rigged" or "stolen." And Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness *knows* this. We all
know it. So Trump is telling us that if he loses, he is going to instigate violence.
NoBody
2024-05-06 12:04:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit what you wont' do your own homework nor that you
can find where Rudely's work showed anything about blood. Will your
next post be a retratction of your remarks?
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-06 15:19:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
NoBody
2024-05-07 11:23:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Rudely before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin. If you can't communicate like an adult and contribute in a
positive fashion, the identity will be gone to the file.

Both posters claimed Trump talked about about blood and none of the
citations provided said that. This is known as a lie.
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-07 15:55:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Prof. Canoza before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin.
Do whatever you want, you petulant bitchy little child.
If you can't communicate like an adult and
Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA HA*!

"oh look..."
"Mitchie"
"Swilly"
"...and lying lee has fled..."

You're the petulant, bitchy, *entitled* little child.

Go ahead and kill-file me, you piece of rotten moldy dog shit. Doing that — and
*announcing* it, as your infantile ADHD mind requires you to do — only makes you
look stupid and secures your place as "the most kill-filed fuckwit in Usenet."

I know you're going to announce it. You can't *not* do that.
NoBody
2024-05-08 12:57:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after
former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their
response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just
peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Prof. Canoza before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin.
Do whatever you want, you petulant bitchy little child.
If you can't communicate like an adult and
Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
Fair enough. Now you'll have impulsively create another user name.

<plonk>
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-08 14:36:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after
former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their
response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just
peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Prof. Canoza before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin.
Do whatever you want, you petulant bitchy little child.
If you can't communicate like an adult and
Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
Fair enough.
<plonk>
I was right. As a narcissistic child, you have a crippling need for attention.
You insist that people care about whose posts you read and to whom you reply.
Mitchell Holman
2024-05-08 18:29:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at
Trump's instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at
Google. And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for
replying to him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's
in the bottom of my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing
reasoned replies that illuminate alternate points of view and
are free of name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Prof. Canoza before this identity joins your others in
the bozo bin.
Do whatever you want, you petulant bitchy little child.
If you can't communicate like an adult and
Ha ha ha! *HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
Fair enough.
<plonk>
I was right. As a narcissistic child, you have a crippling need for attention.
Funny how many people come to that
same conclusion about "Nobody".............
Governor Swill
2024-05-09 12:24:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Go ahead and kill-file me, you piece of rotten moldy dog shit.
Rose Nyland would call her a "gerkarnanokken" - the exact moment when dog shit turns
white.

Swill
--
Trump cites FBI stats to prove crime going down, 2019

<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/crime-down-does-president-trump-deserve-credit>

Trump dismisses FBI stats that prove crime is going down, 2024

<https://people.com/fact-check-trump-false-claims-crime-rates-8624660>


Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-07 18:39:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Rudely before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin. If you can't communicate like an adult and contribute in a
positive fashion, the identity will be gone to the file.
Both posters claimed Trump talked about about blood
No one claimed he talked about "blood." What he didn't do is unequivocally state
he will not support violence if he loses. An unequivocal statement that he will
not incite or support violence is the *only* acceptable answer.

Trump will incite violence if he loses. We know this because he has told us, in
his slovenly coded way.
Blue Lives Matter
2024-05-07 19:25:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Trump will incite violence if he loses. We know this because he has told us, in
his slovenly coded way.
No, you don't know anything of the sort. Neither do the talking heads
on TV who lie about it, but you all know that Biden is circling the
bowl and fear mongering is all you've got.
Governor Swill
2024-05-09 16:51:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 07 May 2024 15:25:28 -0400, Blue Lives Matter
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by Mike Colangelo
Trump will incite violence if he loses. We know this because he has told us, in
his slovenly coded way.
No, you don't know anything of the sort. Neither do the talking heads
on TV who lie about it, but you all know that Biden is circling the
bowl and fear mongering is all you've got.
Yes he has, asshat. Stop treating everybody who doesn't kiss Trump's feet like they're
stupid. We know what he says. We know what he means. He leads a base that would rather
believe a lie that makes them feel good than an uncomfortable fact. They, like you, are
ruled by emotions rather than good sense.

Swill
--
Trump cites FBI stats to prove crime going down, 2019

<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/crime-down-does-president-trump-deserve-credit>

Trump dismisses FBI stats that prove crime is going down, 2024

<https://people.com/fact-check-trump-false-claims-crime-rates-8624660>


Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
Governor Swill
2024-05-09 16:45:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel
protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after
former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their
response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't
mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia,
students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from
attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with
a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination
of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as
long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said
Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly
removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation
of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic
of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National
Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised  "the way they [NYPD] walked
in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began
pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just
peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
None of Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness's shrill, bitchy, petulant
demands for "cites" are ever in good faith. For what it's worth, I
When Rudely does your homework, you really suck as a troll.
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump won't rule out election violence if he loses to Biden in
November: 'It depends'"
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-didnt-rule-out-election-related-violence-if-he-loses-2024-4
THIS is your proof?
""I think we're going to win," he said. "And if we don't win, you
know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.""
Nothing about "bloody protest" nor did he call for them. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump fails to rule out possibility of post-election violence"
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-fails-rule-possibility-post-election-violence-rcna150168
The exact same quote that doesn't back up your claim. Next?
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump doesn’t rule out political violence if he loses, and other
takeaways from his Time interview"
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/trump-political-violence-2024-time-interview/index.html
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump says 'it depends' if there will be violence if he loses 2024
election to Biden"
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-asked-violence-loses-november-election-biden-depends/story?id=109787140
Exact same out of context quote that doesn't back up the claim about
"bloody violence"
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
"Trump Again Vows Mass Deportations and Won’t Rule Out Political Violence"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/us/politics/trump-time-migrants-election.html
Ditto
Post by John Doe
Post by Blue Lives Matter
If he loses, there will be violence, and it will be at Trump's
instigation, just as it was last time.
Thanks for the links! It's good to see people who are adept at Google.
And I agree with your assessments.
Did you copy off the guy's paper in school who always got F's?
Rudely's googling didn't back up your claim. Thanks for replying to
him so I could a great laugh at your expense. He's in the bottom of
my killfile where he belongs.
Now do you OWN work.
Thank you so much for that contribution! I always love hearing reasoned
replies that illuminate alternate points of view and are free of
name-calling and denigration. Well done!
So you both admit
Whenever you say that someone has "admitted" something, he hasn't.
Last warning Rudely before this identity joins your others in the bozo
bin. If you can't communicate like an adult and contribute in a
positive fashion, the identity will be gone to the file.
Both posters claimed Trump talked about about blood
No one claimed he talked about "blood." What he didn't do is unequivocally state
he will not support violence if he loses. An unequivocal statement that he will
not incite or support violence is the *only* acceptable answer.
Trump will incite violence if he loses. We know this because he has told us, in
his slovenly coded way.
And because he has done it once before. The thing is, his sycophants, having had a taste
of the rewards of violence in his name might not be so willing to try it again.

Swill

--
Trump cites FBI stats to prove crime going down, 2019

<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/crime-down-does-president-trump-deserve-credit>

Trump dismisses FBI stats that prove crime is going down, 2024

<https://people.com/fact-check-trump-false-claims-crime-rates-8624660>


Not left, not right, https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
NoBody
2024-05-05 13:47:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by John Doe
Post by NoBody
Post by John Doe
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
--
Let's go Brandon!
I agree with COlbert that peaceful protests are OK. (And I understand
that we all agree that some of the protests were not peaceful.)
What puzzles me is when Trump says (1) All the protests should stop but
(2) if he doesn't win the next election, bloody protests are just peachy.
Care to cite point 2 (and please avoid citing out of context or
distorted remarks)?
Since these are even reported internationally, I don't think your
request for me to Google for you is in good faith.
Got it. You're good with claiming generalities as fact but suck at
backing them up. It's YOUR claim. Is there a reason why you refuse
to support your own position?
OrigInfoJunkie
2024-05-03 18:52:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
Those protesters are correct.
NoBody
2024-05-04 13:45:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
So Colbert is an anti-Semite. Who knew?
Max Boot
2024-05-04 19:15:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
So Colbert is an anti-Semite. Who knew?
He isn't.

Protesting Israel's war crimes and crimes against humanity is not anti-semitic.
TruthBarker
2024-05-06 11:02:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Ubiquitous
CBS' late-night comedian Stephen Colbert defended the anti-Israel protesters
who have taken over university campuses across the country after former
President Donald Trump praised police in New York for their response to
protesters at Columbia University.
On Tuesday's show, Stephen Colbert said the public should support the
protesters "as long as they are peaceful." But Colbert didn't mention that in
some cases, protesters have behaved violently. At Columbia, students smashed
through windows and doors to occupy Hamilton Hall.
At some schools, demonstrators have blocked other students from attending
class. At George Washington University, one protester was seen with a sign
saying "Final Solution" -- a reference to the Nazi's extermination of Jews.
Colbert bypassed these incidences during Tuesday's segment.
"Now even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as
they are peaceful, subjects should be allowed to protest," said Colbert.
"It's their First Amendment right."
http://youtu.be/E4s126jCHGc
Colbert also criticized those university leaders who have forcibly removed
the encampments that left-wing students have created in violation of campus
policy.
"College administrators are using the classic de-escalation tactic of sending
in heavily armed police and threatening to call the National Guard," the
comedian said.
Colbert's defense of the anti-Israel protests came the same day former
President Donald Trump praised the NYPD for its action in removing
encampments at Columbia.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump praised "the way they [NYPD] walked in" and
"were not afraid of anything."
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
At the City University of New York, anti-Israel demonstrators began pushing
the police line and allegedly stormed a building near the anti-Israel
encampment on campus.
So Colbert is an anti-Semite. Who knew?
Sure, he is a proud to be anti-Semitic like many Americans who are
witnessing mass slaughter in Gaza. Now you know!

Here is song enjoyed by many anti-Semitic people in America


Don’t forget Lee is also proud of Trump’s ‘Christian Lee bible’.
OrigInfoJunkie
2024-05-05 17:37:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Meanwhile, anti-Israel violence continues to roil campuses across the
country.
That's a lie. *All* the violence has come from Zionist counter-protesters and cops.
Loading...